[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”4%||4%||true|false” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_row column_structure=”1_2,1_2″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”1_2″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” text_text_color=”#000000″ width=”100%” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n
<\/span><\/p>\n <\/span><\/p>\n <\/span><\/p>\n Scholarly Ontology allows the indirect linking of concepts through the various Type classes. Especially in the case of ActivityType the hierarchically organized lexical terms serve multiple purposes: (1) they denote the nature of activities; (2) they provide context for other SO relations (e.g. employs, usesTool, etc.) and function as semantic bridge between various perspectives; (3) they provide a retrieval index; (4) they function as a \u201cgateway\u201d through which other taxonomic structures (along with the resources annotated by them) can be imported\/mapped (e.g. TaDIRAH, Oxford ICT, etc.).<\/span><\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_2″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_image src=”https:\/\/scholarlyontology.aueb.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/ActivityTypes.svg” title_text=”ActivityTypes” align=”right” force_fullwidth=”on” _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”100px” custom_margin=”||||false|false” custom_padding=”||||false|false” global_colors_info=”{}” transform_styles__hover_enabled=”on|hover” transform_scale__hover_enabled=”on|hover” transform_translate__hover_enabled=”on|desktop” transform_rotate__hover_enabled=”on|desktop” transform_skew__hover_enabled=”on|desktop” transform_origin__hover_enabled=”on|desktop” transform_scale__hover=”120%|120%”][\/et_pb_image][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”0px||0px||true|false” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”0px||0px||true|false” custom_padding=”0px||0px||true|false” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_divider color=”#3D005B” divider_position=”center” divider_weight=”2px” _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” width=”20%” module_alignment=”center” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_divider][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”4%||4%||true|false” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” text_text_color=”#0a0a0a” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n <\/p>\n In Scholarly Ontology (SO) the classes\u00a0Activity <\/em>and\u00a0Method <\/em>capture the distinction between describing how a deliberate act was actually carried out and describing a preconceived way for carrying out this type of activity. More generally, the <\/span>\u2018how\u2019<\/em> <\/span>and\u00a0\u2018why\u2019<\/em> <\/span>aspects of scholarly domain, as captured by the Method<\/em>, ResearchQuestion<\/em>\u00a0<\/span>and\u00a0<\/span>Goal<\/em>\u00a0<\/span>concepts, can be considered to represent a\u00a0<\/span>\u2018methodological level\u2019<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0<\/span>concerning non-factual entities that prescribe how or explain why things are done. Conversely, the\u00a0\u2018what\u2019 <\/em>and\u00a0\u2018who\u2019 <\/em>aspects, as captured by concepts such as:\u00a0 Activity<\/em>,\u00a0 InformationResource<\/em>,\u00a0 Tool<\/em>\u00a0<\/span>and\u00a0<\/span>Actor<\/em>, represent factual entities of the scholarly domain and thus arguably belong to a\u00a0<\/span>\u2018factual level\u2019<\/em><\/strong>.<\/p>\n Type<\/em>\u00a0<\/span>on the other hand, comprising the various kinds of controlled vocabularies employed for classification purposes, such as ActivityType, InformationResourceType, MediaType, TopicKeyword<\/em>, can be regarded as a semantic bridge between the methodological and factual levels. This indirect linking of concepts through the various types generates patterns that can be exploited in designing reusable access structures and rules based on the interplay of intentionality and functionality properties.<\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][et_pb_image src=”https:\/\/scholarlyontology.aueb.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/Theory_vs_Practice.svg” title_text=”Theory_vs_Practice” show_bottom_space=”off” align=”center” force_fullwidth=”on” _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” transform_scale=”110%|110%” custom_padding=”6%||6%|1%|true|false” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” transform_styles__hover_enabled=”on|desktop” transform_scale__hover_enabled=”on|desktop” transform_translate__hover_enabled=”on|desktop” transform_rotate__hover_enabled=”on|desktop” transform_skew__hover_enabled=”on|desktop” transform_origin__hover_enabled=”on|desktop” transform_scale__hover=”125%|125%” sticky_enabled=”0″][\/et_pb_image][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Activity Types Rationale Scholarly Ontology allows the indirect linking of concepts through the various Type classes. Especially in the case of ActivityType the hierarchically organized lexical terms serve multiple purposes: (1) they denote the nature of activities; (2) they provide context for other SO relations (e.g. employs, usesTool, etc.) and function as semantic bridge between […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"on","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-39","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/scholarlyontology.aueb.gr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/39","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/scholarlyontology.aueb.gr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/scholarlyontology.aueb.gr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scholarlyontology.aueb.gr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scholarlyontology.aueb.gr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=39"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/scholarlyontology.aueb.gr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/39\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":195,"href":"https:\/\/scholarlyontology.aueb.gr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/39\/revisions\/195"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/scholarlyontology.aueb.gr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=39"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Rationale<\/span><\/h4>\n
Semantic Levels<\/h4>\n